Copy linkFacebookXPinterestEmailShare this article 0Join the conversationFollow usAdd us as a preferred source on GoogleNewsletterSubscribe to our newsletterBrentford were Brentford on Friday night: ruthlessly organised, with the physical strength and tactical diligence of their man-to-man pressing wrestling Chelsea into patterns they didnt want to form. They broke up play, they made it scrappy, and then they capitalised in key moments: set-pieces (goals one and three) and counter-attacks (goal two).It was textbook, and although sometimes Brentford at their absolute best are simply unstoppable, particularly at home, it does beg the question: had Alonso done his homework?Put bluntly, this was not the time to trial a brand new midfield partnership featuring two players making their full Premier League debuts, one a youngster who has only played a handful of games in England and one a veteran who never had the agility or dexterity to play through Brentford-style pressure.Henderson-Barco pivot problemsAs I highlighted a fortnight ago, Alonsos two-man midfield contains tactical flaws that might just be unsolvable. They definitely wont be solved by a Jordan Henderson and Valentin Barco pivot, not against Brentfords midfield.Heres a typical example of where it went wrong. Brentford hold their ground, forcing Lacroix to keep the ball for 13 seconds before attempting an ambitious long ball out to the left. He has no options because Brentfords man-to-man press prevents it; because neither Barco nor Henderson can be trusted to get on the ball, resist pressure, and break the lines. You may like Aston Villa connection is a damning assessment of Tottenham Hotspurs �175 million midfield Chelsea are scoring for fun but there's one bad habit Xabi Alonso needs to break to turn them into contenders Forget right-backs in midfield, Arsenals five-on-two shows Chelseas system is the problem Brentfords second goal, scored on the break, resulted from the same issue. Henderson gets on the ball here and, with nothing in the pocket to play, fires an ambitious pass that gets intercepted, leading to the goal:Malo Gusto and Romeo Lavia, both on the bench, would have been far better suited to the challenge, although, more importantly, Alonso should have adapted his 3-4-2-1 formation.Get FourFourTwo NewsletterThe best features, fun and footballing quizzes, straight to your inbox every week.Contact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsorsBy submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.Already, that 3-4-2-1 is too easy to read, too easy for someone like Keith Andrews to prepare for. Chelsea needed Morgan Rogers or Cole Palmer to drop short and wide, or one of the wing-backs to come infield to create an overload, or anything, really, that would have been unexpected; that might have bamboozled Brentford or at least pulled a man-to-man marker out of position.Chelsea attempted 28 crosses in this match, each one predictably swatted away. They got done by Brentford like Brentford used to do teams in their first season in the Premier League, which is to say Alonso just didnt look adequately prepared.If Chelsea are to challenge for honours, he needs to adapt much faster than this.TOPICSJordan HendersonMalo GustoRomeo LaviaCole PalmerChelseaBrentfordPremier LeagueAlex KebleFreelance Tactics WriterAlex Keble is a freelance football journalist based in London, specialising in tactical analysis. Hehas written forBBC Sport, Goal, The Mirror, The Independent, Football 365, and many others. As well as covering Premier League football, Alex works as a child therapist.
