A major shift in WWEs legal strategy has come to light and it could affect every wrestler under contract moving forward.
According to Wrestling Observer Radios Bryan Alvarez, WWEs new TKO contracts now include a standard one-year non-compete clause if a talent is fired for cause or breach. Thats a massive leap from the traditional 90-day non-compete period most fans and talent are familiar with. Alvarez confirmed that this clause isnt just a one-off situation. Its now baked into all new WWE contracts under the TKO Group Holdings banner.
The revelation explains Andrade El Idolos current absence from AEW after a surprise appearance that sparked interest in his post-WWE career. Initially, reports pointed to a 90-day hold-up due to his WWE exit, with Fightful Select noting he had a strong legal team and might contest the clause. But now, its clear the delay is tied to this more aggressive one-year non-compete term.
Andrades case vcould now at the center of a much larger issue. It raises serious questions about how enforceable these clauses are especially without pay, as previously reported in Andrades situation. The clause may be written into contracts, but whether it can stand up in court is another story entirely.
As for Andrade, hes staying quiet for now but dont be surprised if his legal team makes a move soon. History shows WWEs non-compete clauses dont always stick; just ask Brock Lesnar, who fought back in 2004.
The game has changed, and WWEs talent might find themselves locked down longer than ever if they dont tread carefully.
Would you challenge a one-year non-compete clause if it meant sitting out unpaid? Think WWEs new contract rules are fair, or is this going too far? Sound off in the comments.
