Billy Gunn didnt hold back when discussing what he believes is the biggest difference between todays wrestling and the era that built his career. While speaking with Chris Van Vliet, the veteran star shared his thoughts on how the industry has evolved over the last 30 years. When asked directly what stands out the most, Gunn delivered a blunt assessment of the modern style. He explained that, in his view, many matches today prioritize flashy offense instead of structure and storytelling something he believes was a core strength of wrestling in the past. Gunn continued by saying that the lack of structure is what stands out most when he watches modern matches. His comments tap into a long-running debate between generations of wrestlers. Many veterans have argued that storytelling psychology once mattered more than athletic spectacle, while newer talent often lean into fast-paced, high-impact action. Still, Gunn didnt frame his remarks as bitterness instead, they came across as concern about how the business continues to evolve. Do you agree with Billy Gunns take on modern wrestling, or do you think todays style is better than ever? Sound off in the comments and share your opinion. G Add as a preferred source on Google
