As the legal case between former WWE paralegal Janel Grant and Vince McMahon continues to develop in court, Jasmin St. Claire has weighed inand shes not holding back. On Friday, U.S. District Judge Sarah F. Russell denied Grants request for early discovery in the lawsuit, but left the door open for her to refile after WWE and McMahon formally move to compel arbitration. While the legal ruling was procedural, it reignited online discussion surrounding Grants explosive allegationsand Jasmin St. Claire added her voice to the conversation with two heated posts on X. In her first response, St. Claire accused Grant of manipulating the situation for personal gain. She followed up with a second post condemning women who break NDAs after accepting settlements. Grant filed the lawsuit in January 2024, alleging sexual abuse, trafficking, and coercion by McMahon and negligence by WWE. Her claims led to McMahons resignation from WWE and TKO corporate positions. McMahon has denied all allegations. Grant was paid $3 million in a prior NDA, but argues that agreement was signed under coercive conditions and should not bind her case to private arbitration. Fridays court decision does not determine the validity of Grants allegations or whether the case stays public. It simply pauses her request to gather evidence before WWE and McMahon formally respond. Judge Russell stated that the court is expressing no opinion on Grants upcoming arguments to avoid arbitrationbut the spotlight is far from dimming. Now, with public figures like Jasmin St. Claire taking such strong positions online, the case continues to stir heated debate both inside and outside the wrestling world. Do you agree with Jasmin St. Claires take on Janel Grants lawsuit, or do you believe this case deserves to stay in the public eye and go to trial? Sound off in the comments and let us know what you think. G Add as a preferred source on Google
